Representasi Gaya Kepemimpinan Tokoh Bossman dalam Film "My Stupid Boss"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46975/7mey1z46Keywords:
Leadership Styles, Authoritarian Leadership, Leadership Characteristics, My Stupid Boss Movie, Work Environment, SDGs 8Abstract
Authoritarian leadership styles are often depicted in popular media, such as films, to illustrate complex workplace dynamics. This study aims to identify the characteristics and authoritarian leadership style represented by the character Bossman in the film "My Stupid Boss" (2016). The research employs a qualitative method with a content analysis approach through repeated viewing of scenes, dialogues, and interactions that represent leadership behaviors. The results indicate that Bossman exhibits characteristics of authoritarian leadership, such as unilateral decision-making, centralized control, distrust of employees, a need for praise, and inconsistent behavior. This leadership style fosters a toxic work environment, hinders productivity, and contradicts the principles of decent work outlined in SDG 8. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of collaborative and adaptive leadership in creating a healthy work environment that supports employee development.
References
Appelbaum, S. H., Ayre, N., & Shapiro, B. T. (2023). The “new normal”: Agile management strategies and sustainability in the post-pandemic era. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(1), 1-25.
Banks, G. C., Fischer, T., Gooty, J., & Stock, G. (2021). Leadership, stress, and well-being: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, *32*(5), 101518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101518
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2020). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
Bianchini, S., Müller, M., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2024). Digital transformation and management innovation: A systematic review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 123024.
Chen, Y., & Arya, B. (2021). Authoritarian leadership and task performance: The role of obedience pressure and trust in leader. Journal of Business Research, 135, 528-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.056
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. (2019). A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development: A test of the leader flexibility hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 72(4), 563–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12332
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2020). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101379
Ferraro, T., dos Santos, N. R., Moreira, J. M., & Pais, L. (2023). Does toxic leadership necessarily undermine decent work? The moderating role of psychological capital. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 45(7), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2023-0034
Greenbaum, R. L., Bonner, J. M., Mawritz, M. B., & Kim, J. (2023). The destructive effects of supervisors’ failure to acknowledge mistakes: An investigation of cascading effects on subordinates and teams. Personnel Psychology, 76(1), 39-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12541
Hussain, S., & Hassan, H. (2016). An analysis of leadership styles and their effectiveness in the public sector. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies, *3*(4), 58-63. https://www.ijrmbs.com/vol3issue4/hussain.pdf
Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471388
Lee, K., & Kim, H. (2019). When is authoritarian leadership less detrimental? The role of leader capability. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.05.007
Lee, S. (2022). Pseudo-participation and its consequences: The detrimental effects of perceived participative leadership on employee well-being. Personnel Review, 51(3), 973-990. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2020-0903
Lee, S., Han, S., Cheong, M., Kim, S. L., & Yun, S. (2019). Why and when authoritarian leadership leads to employee silence: The roles of procedural justice and traditionality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9-10), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2395
Lee, S., Hwang, J., & Choi, J. N. (2019). The dark side of leadership: A relational perspective of despotic leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(5), 575-591. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2018-0367
Li, G., He, W., & Yam, K. C. (2022). A meta-analysis of the authoritarian leadership literature: The important role of followers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(7), 1257-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2645
Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573997
Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2021). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 47(8), 1940–1965.
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100
Martinko, M. J., et al. (2022). The role of causal reasoning in the leadership process: A systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior
Mathieu, C., Fabi, B., Lacoursière, R., & Raymond, L. (2020). The role of supervisory behavior in fostering subordinate’s psychological well-being: The mediating role of distributive
Neuman, W. L. (2021). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (8th ed.). Pearson.
Nguyen, L., & Smith, P. (2019). Adaptive leadership in organizational contexts: A situational approach. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(3), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818823521
Nguyen, T., Patel, R., & Simmons, A. (2021). Authoritarian leadership: Characteristics, consequences, and situational effectiveness. Journal of Leadership Studies, 15(4), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21789
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nurdin, N., Rijal, S., & Ahmar, A. S. (2023). The effect of strategic management practices on organizational performance: Empirical evidence from public sector organizations. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2186637.
Reyes, D. L., Heslin, P. A., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2023). Leading through the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of leadership flexibility and team effectiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(2), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518231154189
Rosete, D., & Ciarrochi, J. (2020). Emotional intelligence and its relationship to workplace performance outcomes of leadership effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(5), 388-399. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720510614653
Sanders, J., & Wiseman, R. L. (2020). Leadership lessons from the silver screen: A content analysis of leadership in popular films. Journal of Leadership Education, 19(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12806/V19/I1/R1
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2021). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
Smith, A., & Doe, J. (2023). Management innovation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 145(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.01.005
Stacho, Z., Stachová, K., & Urbánová, M. (2022). Effective management and its impact on the innovative potential of employees in the context of the digital age. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 490-502.
Thompson, G., & Glasø, L. (2015). Situational leadership theory: A test from three perspectives. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, *36*(5), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2013-0130
Triwastuti, R. (2023). PERILAKU ORGANISASI. Airlangga University Press.
Wang, A. C., & Guan, B. (2018). The positive effects of authoritarian leadership: A conservation of resources approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(4), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9505-x
Wang, A. C., & Guan, B. (2020). The positive effects of authoritarian leadership: A conservation of resources approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(4), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9505-x
Yukl, G. (2019). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson.
