Penilaian Tekno-Ekonomi Biogasoline dari Pongamia Pinnata (Malapari) untuk Bioenergi Berbasis Komunitas di Pulau Kering: Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis dan Analisis Bibliometrik

Authors

  • Posma Sariguna Johnson Kennedy Universitas Kristen Indonesia Author
  • Alexander Benedictus Bala Tifaona Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Harapan Bangsa Author
  • Budi Leksono Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional Author
  • Philipi de Rozari Universitas Nusa Cendana Author
  • Mesakh Trywira Wibowo Boikh Universitas Nusa Cendana Author
  • Igantius Abraham Enga Tifaona Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Harapan Bangsa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46975/Aliansi268

Keywords:

Pongamia pinnata, Malapari, biogasoline, techno-economic assessment, minimum fuel selling price, biofuel komunitas

Abstract

This study maps the literature on techno-economic assessment (TEA) of biogasoline and advanced biofuels from non-edible vegetable oils, focusing on Pongamia pinnata or Malapari as a community-based bioenergy feedstock for arid islands. From 500 Q1-Q4 journal articles published in 2016-2026, 276 articles were screened and analyzed through systematic literature review and VOSviewer title-abstract co-occurrence mapping. The results show that the field is dominated by biodiesel, biofuel, bioethanol, biorefinery, and renewable energy, while biogasoline and Pongamia pinnata remain peripheral. Key TEA parameters include minimum fuel selling price (MFSP), net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), payback period, capital investment, production cost, feedstock cost, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty. Technological terms such as catalyst, pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, hydrodeoxygenation, pretreatment, oil quality, and oil yield connect process performance with economic feasibility. The novelty lies in integrating Malapari-based biogasoline TEA with oil pretreatment, community supply chains, coproduct revenue, and arid-island contexts such as East Nusa Tenggara.

References

Abdullah, M. A., & Hussein, H. A. (2021). Integrated algal and oil palm biorefinery as a model system for bioenergy co-generation with bioproducts and biopharmaceuticals. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00396-0

Ahmadi, L., Kannangara, M., & Bensebaa, F. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of small scale biomass supply chain and bioenergy production systems in carbon credit markets: A life cycle perspective. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 37, 100627.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.100627

Alao, K. T., Gilani, S. I.-H., Sopian, K., Alao, T. O., Oyebamiji, D. S., & Oladosu, T. L. (2024). Biomass and organic waste conversion for sustainable bioenergy: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of current research trends and future directions. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 13(4), 750-782. https://doi.org/10.61435/ijred.2024.60149

Aminah, A., Adnan, A., Qomariyah, N., Krisnan, R., Anggraini, L., Supatmi, S.,

Danu, D., Suita, E., Cahyono, D. D. N., Lukman, A. H., Syamsuwida, D., & Djam'an, D. (2025). Unlocking the potential of Pongamia pinnata: A scoping review and bibliometric analysis (ScoRBA) guided by the PAGER framework. Forest Science and Technology, 21(3), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2025.2512209

Anekwe, I. M. S., Lora, E. E. S., Subramanian, K. A., Kozlov, A., Zhang, S., Oboirien, B., & Isa, Y. M. (2024). Techno-economic and life-cycle analysis of single-step catalytic conversion of bioethanol to fuel blendstocks over Ni-doped HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst.

Energy Conversion and Management: X, 22, 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100529

Anwar, M. (2021). Biodiesel feedstocks selection strategies based on economic, technical, and sustainable aspects. Fuel, 283, 119204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119204

Barahmand, Z., & Eikeland, M. S. (2022). Techno-economic and life cycle cost analysis through the lens of uncertainty: A scoping review. Sustainability, 14(19), 12191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912191

Byun, J., & Han, J. (2020). Sustainable development of biorefineries: Integrated assessment method for co-production pathways. Energy & Environmental Science, 13(8), 2233-

https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee00812e

Cervi, W. R., Lamparelli, R. A. C., Seabra, J. E. A., Junginger, M., de Jong, S., & van der Hilst, F. (2019). Spatial modeling of techno-economic potential of biojet fuel production in Brazil. GCB Bioenergy, 12(2), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12659

Chai, S. Y. W., Phang, F. J. F., Yeo, L. S., Ngu, L. H., & How, B. S. (2022). Future era of techno-economic analysis: Insights from review. Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, 924047. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.924047

Dalemans, F., Muys, B., & Maertens, M. (2019). A framework for profitability evaluation of agroforestry-based biofuel value chains: An application to pongamia in India. GCB Bioenergy, 11(7), 852-870. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12605

Degani, E., Prasad, M. V. R., Paradkar, A., Pena, R., Soltangheisi, A., Ullah, I., Warr, B., & Tibbett, M. (2022). A critical review of Pongamia pinnata multiple applications:

From land remediation and carbon sequestration to socioeconomic benefits. Journal of

Environmental Management, 324, 116297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116297

Diederichs, G. W., Mandegari, M. A., Farzad, S., & Görgens, J. F. (2016). Technoeconomic comparison of biojet fuel production from lignocellulose, vegetable oil and sugar cane juice. Bioresource Technology, 216, 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.090

Fu, R., Kang, L., Zhang, C., & Fei, Q. (2023). Application and progress of techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment in biomanufacturing of fuels and chemicals. Green

Chemical Engineering, 4(2), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gce.2022.09.003

Kennedy, P. S. J. (2026). Model bisnis keberlanjutan dalam implementasi crowd planting Malapari di Kabupaten Lembata. Aliansi: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 20(2), 165179. https://doi.org/10.46975/r5ckwd39

Leksono, B., Rahman, S. A., Larjavaara, M., Purbaya, D. A., Arpiwi, N. L., Samsudin, Y.

B., Artati, Y., Windyarini, E., Sudrajat, D. J., Aminah, A., Maulana, A. M., Bhatta, K. P., Kwon, J., & Baral, H. (2021). Pongamia: A possible option for degraded land restoration and bioenergy production in Indonesia. Forests, 12(11), 1468. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111468

Rhofita, E. I., Rachmat, R., Meyer, M., & Montastruc, L. (2022). Mapping analysis of biomass residue valorization as the future green energy generation in Indonesia.

Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131667

Scown, C. D., Baral, N. R., Yang, M., Vora, N., & Huntington, T. (2021). Technoeconomic analysis for biofuels and bioproducts. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 67, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.01.002

Sihombing, J. L., Gea, S., Wirjosentono, B., Agusnar, H., Pulungan, A. N., Herlinawati, H., Yusuf, M., & Hutapea, Y. A. (2020). Characteristic and catalytic performance of Co and Co-Mo metal impregnated in Sarulla natural zeolite catalyst for hydrocracking of MEFA rubber seed oil into biogasoline fraction. Catalysts, 10(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010121

Silaen, M., Taylor, R., Bößner, S., Anger-Kraavi, A., Chewpreecha, U., Badinotti, A., & Takama, T. (2020). Lessons from Bali for small-scale biogas development in Indonesia. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.09.003

Tifaona, A. B. B., Kennedy, P. S. J., Lawe, L., Tifaona, I. A. E., & Lestari, A. (2026). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengembangan agroforestri Malapari dan ekonomi hijau di Kabupaten Lembata. Business Management Journal, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30813/bmj.v22i1.8183

Wang, W.-C. (2019). Techno-economic analysis for evaluating the potential feedstocks for producing hydro-processed renewable jet fuel in Taiwan. Energy, 179, 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.181

Widyastuti, Zulfa, L. L., Safrida, N., Ardhyananta, H., Triwicaksono, S., Kurniawansyah, F., Anityasari, M., Ali, B. T. I., & Raihan, J. N. (2024). Catalytic cracking of crude palm oil into biogasoline over HZSM-5 and USY-Zeolite catalysts: A comparative study. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 50, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2024.07.009

Ying, H. P., Chien, C. B. P., & Van, F. Y. (2020). Operational management implemented in biofuel upstream supply chain and downstream international trading: Current issues in Southeast Asia. Energies, 13(7), 1799. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071799

Zhu, Y., Jones, S. B., Schmidt, A. J., Albrecht, K. O., Edmundson, S. J., & Anderson, D. B. (2019). Techno-economic analysis of alternative aqueous phase treatment methods for microalgae hydrothermal liquefaction and biocrude upgrading system. Algal Research, 39, 101467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.10

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): Aliansi: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis

Section

Article

How to Cite

Penilaian Tekno-Ekonomi Biogasoline dari Pongamia Pinnata (Malapari) untuk Bioenergi Berbasis Komunitas di Pulau Kering: Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis dan Analisis Bibliometrik. (2026). Aliansi : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 21(1), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.46975/Aliansi268

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.