Pengaruh Assessment Center terhadap Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia di Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46975/309Keywords:
Assessment Center, Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia, Pengembangan Pegawai, Kementerian PertahananAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh Assessment Center terhadap peningkatan kualitas sumber daya manusia di Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada pentingnya sistem penilaian yang objektif, terstruktur, dan berbasis kompetensi dalam mengembangkan pegawai yang profesional dan berkinerja tinggi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan asosiatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penyebaran kuesioner kepada pegawai di lingkungan Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia yang telah mengikuti proses Assessment Center. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan regresi linear sederhana dengan bantuan perangkat lunak SPSS versi 31.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Assessment Center berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kualitas sumber daya manusia. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan nilai signifikansi uji t yang lebih kecil dari 0,05 serta nilai koefisien determinasi (R²) yang menunjukkan besarnya kontribusi Assessment Center terhadap peningkatan kualitas sumber daya manusia. Dengan demikian, penerapan Assessment Center dapat menjadi strategi yang efektif dalam meningkatkan kompetensi, kinerja, dan profesionalisme pegawai. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, disarankan agar Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia terus mengembangkan dan mengoptimalkan pemanfaatan Assessment Center sebagai alat evaluasi dan pengembangan pegawai secara berkelanjutan.
References
Appelbaum, S. H., Kay, F., & Shapiro, B. T. (1989). The Assessment Centre is Not Dead! How to Keep it Alive and Well. Journal of Management Development, 8(5), 51–65. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001362
Becker, N., Höft, S., Holzenkamp, M., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). The Predictive Validity of Assessment Centers in German-Speaking Regions: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10(2), 61–69. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000031
Blair, C. A., Helland, K., & Walton, B. (2017). Leaders behaving badly: The relationship between narcissism and unethical leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 333–346. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2015-0209
Buckett, A., Becker, J. R., & Roodt, G. (2017). General performance factors and group differences in assessment center ratings. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(4), 298–313. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-08-2016-0264
CAMPBELL, R. J., & BRAY, D. W. (1993). USE OF AN ASSESSMENT CENTER AS AN AID IN MANAGEMENT SELECTION. Personnel Psychology, 46(3), 691–698. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00894.x
Coulton, G. F., & Feild, H. S. (1995). Using Assessment Centers in Selecting Entry-Level Police Officers: Extravagance or Justified Expense? Public Personnel Management, 24(2), 223–254. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609502400210
Dobson, P., & Williams, A. (1989). The validation of the selection of male British Army officers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62(4), 313–325. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1989.tb00502.x
Edelman, P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Emotional intelligence, management of subordinate’s emotions, and leadership effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 592–607. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2018-0154
Engelbrecht, A. S., & Fischer, A. H. (1995). The Managerial Performance Implications of a Developmental Assessment Center Process. Human Relations, 48(4), 387–404. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800405
Fine, S., Goldenberg, J., & Noam, Y. (2016). Integrity testing and the prediction of counterproductive behaviours in the military. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(1), 198–218. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12117
Fluckinger, C. D., Dudley, N. M., & Seeds, M. (2014). Incremental Validity of Interactive Multimedia Simulations in Two Organizations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(1), 108–112. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12061
Francis-Smythe, J., & Smith, P. M. (1997). The psychological impact of assessment in a development center. Human Relations, 50(2), 149–167. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679705000203
Furnham, A. (2008). HR professionals’ beliefs about, and knowledge of, assessment techniques and psychometric tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(3), 300–305. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00436.x
Garavan, T. N. (2007). Using assessment centre performance to predict subjective person-organisation (P-O) fit: A longitudinal study of graduates. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(2), 150–167. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710726410
Gibbons, A. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). Dimension consistency as an individual difference: A new (old) perspective on the assessment center construct validity debate. Journal of Management, 35(5), 1154–1180. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328504
Goodstein, L. D., & Lanyon, R. I. (1999). Applications of personality assessment to the workplace: A review. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(3), 291–322. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022941331649
Hart, G. L., & Thompson, P. H. (1979). Assessment centers: For selection or development? Organizational Dynamics, 7(4), 63–77. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(79)90022-6
Hermelin, E., Lievens, F., & Robertson, I. T. (2007). The validity of assessment centres for the prediction of supervisory performance ratings: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(4), 405–411. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00399.x
Ingold, P. V., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., & Melchers, K. G. (2016). Transparency of Assessment Centers: Lower Criterion-related Validity but Greater Opportunity to Perform? Personnel Psychology, 69(2), 467–497. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12105
John Bernardin, H., Konopaske, R., & Hagan, C. M. (2012). A comparison of adverse impact levels based on top-down, multisource, and assessment center data: Promoting diversity and reducing legal challenges. Human Resource Management, 51(3), 313–341. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21472
Juniper, B., Bellamy, P., & White, N. (2011). Testing the performance of a new approach to measuring employee well-being. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 344–357. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111134634
Kirton, G., & Healy, G. (2009). Using competency-based assessment centres to select judges—Implications for equality and diversity. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 302–318. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00099.x
Krause, D. E., Kersting, M., Heggestad, E. D., & Thornton III, G. C. (2006). Incremental validity of assessment center ratings over cognitive ability tests: A study at the executive management level. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(4), 360–371. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00357.x
Lee, S.-H., & Phan, P. (2000). Competencies of directors in global firms: Requirements for recruitment and evaluation. Corporate Governance, 8(3), 204–214. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00199
Lehman, M. S., Hudson Jr., J. R., Appley, G. W., Sheehan Jr., E. J., & Slevin, D. P. (2011). Modified assessment center approach facilitates organizational change. Journal of Management Development, 30(9), 893–913. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111164367
Lievens, F., Van Keer, E., & Volckaert, E. (2010). Gathering Behavioral Samples Through a Computerized and Standardized Assessment Center Exercise: Yes, It Is Possible. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(2), 94–98. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000010
Melchers, K. G., & Basch, J. M. (2022). Fair play? Sex-, age-, and job-related correlates of performance in a computer-based simulation game. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(1), 48–61. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12337
Robertson, I. T., & Smith, M. (2001). Personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 441–472. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167479
Shakeri, I., & Lievens, F. (2025). A head-to-head comparison of situational judgment tests and assessment centers for measuring and predicting the same performance dimensions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 33(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12503
Silvester, J., & Dykes, C. (2007). Selecting political candidates: A longitudinal study of assessment centre performance and political success in the 2005 UK general election. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), 11–25. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X156287
Speer, A. B., Christiansen, N. D., Melchers, K. G., König, C. J., & Kleinmann, M. (2014). Establishing the Cross-Situational Convergence of the Ability to Identify Criteria: Consistency and Prediction Across Similar and Dissimilar Assessment Center Exercises. Human Performance, 27(1), 44–60. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2013.854364
Spychalski, A. C., Quiñones, M. A., Gaugler, B. B., & Pohley, K. (1997). A survey of assessment center practices in organizations in the United States. Personnel Psychology, 50(1), 71–90. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00901.x
Stage, V., & Houghton, R. (2009). IMI’s aspire program feeds its senior leader pipeline through self-nominations. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 28(5), 16–25. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.20275
Thornton III, G. C., & Krause, D. E. (2009). Selection versus development assessment centers: An international survey of design, execution, and evaluation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(2), 478–498. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802673536
Wirz, A., Melchers, K. G., Lievens, F., De Corte, W., & Kleinmann, M. (2013). Trade-offs between assessor team size and assessor expertise in affecting rating accuracy in assessment centers. Revista de Psicologia Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 29(1), 13–20. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a3
